In an obscure corner of Cold War history, a haunting story has emerged that challenges our understanding of who truly made the first steps on the Moon. According to this theory, it wasn’t American astronauts or Soviet cosmonauts who first ventured onto the lunar surface, but a group of Zambian "Afronauts,". Their tragic mission has been hidden from history, suppressed by the superpowers who refused to acknowledge that a small African nation could have beaten them to the Space Race.
In the early 1960s, as the United States and the Soviet Union scrambled to outpace each other in the space race, Zambia’s independence sparked a wave of ambition and hope. Edward Nkoloso, a visionary and schoolteacher, launched a Zambian space program that, on the surface, appeared naïve. But behind the scenes, the theory suggests, an unidentified third party—possibly a faction within the superpowers—provided Zambia with advanced technology to test the feasibility of lunar travel.
The Zambians were not seen as pioneers, however, but as expendable test subjects—"space rats"—in an unacknowledged Cold War experiment. The mission was not about glory or national pride; it was a cold, calculated move to see whether human beings could even survive the journey to the Moon. The Afronauts, including Matha Mwamba, the young woman chosen by Nkoloso, embarked on the mission with primitive resources and untested equipment. They knew they were taking on an impossible task, but the promise of African achievement drove them forward.
Incredibly, the Afronauts succeeded where the world’s two superpowers had not yet dared—they reached the Moon. But the technology they had been provided was flawed, either by design or neglect. Shortly after landing on the lunar surface, they discovered that the systems required to return to Earth had failed. They were stranded, their oxygen supplies dwindling by the hour, with no hope of rescue. For a few days, the Zambian explorers made their mark on the Moon, knowing full well they would never return home.
Despite their fate, the Afronauts left behind a lasting symbol: using lunar rocks, they built a small, cross-like monument—a symbolic church on the Moon. The monument, which some have referred to as "the Moon Cross," stands as a testament to their resilience, faith, and determination. The Afronauts, isolated on the barren surface, chose to use their final moments to build something spiritual, something that represented both their personal sacrifice and the collective struggle of their nation. This symbolic act became a memorial to the first Africans who, against all odds, set foot on the Moon.
However, their achievement was never acknowledged. Both the Americans and Soviets, according to this theory, were aware of the Zambian mission. Yet rather than recognizing this extraordinary feat, they chose to bury the story. To admit that an African nation had landed on the Moon before either superpower would have upended the carefully constructed narrative of Cold War dominance.
The Afronauts were left to die on the lunar surface in silence. Their mission was kept secret, their success erased from the history books. As NASA prepared for the Apollo missions and the Soviets continued their own space projects, neither side wanted to acknowledge that Zambia—a nation dismissed by the West as backward and incapable—had succeeded first. This cover-up was not just about geopolitics, though; it was also a reflection of the deep racial inequalities that defined global power structures. To admit that African explorers had beaten them to the Moon would have shattered the racist narratives that placed Western and Soviet science at the pinnacle of human achievement.
The story of the Afronauts continues to challenge the official narratives of the space race, raising crucial questions about who is remembered in history and who is erased, particularly in the context of race, power, and science. As marginalized voices increasingly demand recognition in the 21st century, the Afronauts’ mission—whether rooted in fact or legend—stands as a powerful symbol of African achievement silenced by a world unwilling to acknowledge it.
Their tragic journey serves as both a critique of the Eurocentric framing of space exploration and a reminder of the hidden contributions of African nations during pivotal moments of technological progress. Though the Afronauts may have perished in obscurity, their legacy endures, illustrating that history is often more complex than the dominant record suggests, and that the struggle for recognition and equality stretches even to the stars.
References:
Fraser, Alastair. Zambian Space Program: The Dream That Never Took Off. African Affairs Journal, 1974.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. Reframing the Colonial Legacy: African Histories and Futures. Oxford University Press, 2010.
Nyerere, Julius. Africa and the Cold War: The Struggle for Identity. University of Dar es Salaam Press, 1985.
As the 2024 U.S. presidential election draws closer, an old conspiracy theory is making the rounds once again: the real Donald Trump, it claims, died in a helicopter crash in 1989, and a Soviet impostor took his place. With accusations of foreign interference and misinformation swirling around the political landscape, it’s worth examining this story and its origins.
In 1989, as the Soviet Union faced imminent collapse, high-ranking KGB officials from Service A met in secrecy, allegedly planning one last bid for global influence. The USSR was in turmoil, and Gorbachev’s reforms were doing little to stabilize the economy. Faced with inevitable decline, the theory goes, Soviet leaders concocted a long-term strategy: one that would allow them to re-establish influence through unconventional means.
Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, a young Donald Trump was garnering fame and notoriety. Known for his ambition and his flamboyant personality, he was reportedly looking to forge ties with Soviet officials to open up investment opportunities. Then, on October 10, 1989, a helicopter carrying three of Trump’s top executives tragically crashed. Trump himself had reportedly been close to boarding, an event he later cited as a life-changing near-death experience that led to his decision to divorce Ivana Trump(
The conspiracy suggests a different story. Some believe that Trump did not escape the crash, and that Soviet agents replaced him with a look-alike—a carefully trained KGB operative. This imposter, according to the theory, exhibited strange quirks: an odd hairstyle, a unique speaking style, and even eyebrow-raising comments about his daughter Ivanka. Supporters of this theory claim these characteristics are not mere eccentricities but indications of his role as a Soviet actor.
Throughout the 1990s, as the real Soviet Union dissolved, the alleged imposter kept a low political profile, biding his time. The theory holds that once Russia regained stability, Trump’s reappearance was part of a larger plan. Leveraging the power of social media, he positioned himself as an outsider, gaining traction among disillusioned voters. By 2016, he was the Republican nominee, and with targeted financial support, orchestrated attacks, and a wave of disinformation, he ascended to the presidency. The groundwork, many believe, was laid by former Soviet operatives who adapted their strategies to the digital age.
Now, as Trump once again seeks to become president in the 2024 election, this theory has resurfaced, sparking curiosity and intrigue. According to its adherents, his slogan of “America First” serves as a tool to weaken NATO and the U.S.'s long-held alliances, thereby making America less globally involved. With renewed concerns about Russian interference in U.S. elections, some conspiracy theorists suggest that the upcoming election could be the last move in a decades-long chess game: America in isolation, while Russia fills the power vacuum left on the world stage.
References:
New York Times. (1989, October 11). Copter crash kills 3 aides of Trump. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/11/nyregion/copter-crash-kills-3-aides-of-trump.html
PONARS Eurasia. (2020, October 5). The Soviet roots of meddling in U.S. politics. PONARS Eurasia. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/the-soviet-roots-of-meddling-in-u-s-politics/
Vice. (2017, July 28). A timeline of Trump’s long history with Russia. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/a-timeline-of-trumps-long-history-with-russia/
Salon. (2016, April). Donald Trump in 1990. Salon. https://media.salon.com/2016/04/donald_trump1990.jpg
Independent. (2016, October 15). Donald Trump’s creepiest and most unsettling comments about Ivanka. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-creepiest-most-unsettling-comments-a-roundup-a7353876.html
Irish Mirror. (2022, July 14). Ivana Trump divorced Donald after surprising revelation. Irish Mirror. https://www.irishmirror.ie/showbiz/celebrity-news/ivana-trump-divorced-donald-surprising-27490610
Business Insider. (2016, October). Why is Donald Trump’s skin orange? Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.nl/why-is-donald-trumps-skin-orange-2016-10/?international=true&r=US
Smithsonian Magazine. (2017). Michael Jackson, Donald Trump, and other famous Americans who escaped brushes with death. Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/michael-jackson-donald-trump-and-other-famous-americans-who-escaped-brushes-with-death-180963319/
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Trumped! Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trumped!
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Mutual assured destruction. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction
NATO. (n.d.). NATO’s mission and roles. NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/cn/natohq/topics_110496.htm
Overview:
In this project, you and your group will investigate a specific conspiracy theory or historical claim. By conducting thorough research, analyzing sources, and applying critical thinking skills, you’ll determine whether the theory holds up under scrutiny. Your ultimate goal is to answer the question:
“Is this theory grounded in fact, fiction, or a mix of both?”
Group Size: 3-4 students
Timeframe: 1-3 weeks
Develop critical thinking and research skills, such as analyzing timelines, spotting inconsistencies, and assessing the credibility of sources.
Learn to evaluate the reliability of information, a key skill in navigating today’s media landscape.
Apply these skills to both historical and contemporary conspiracy theories or claims.
Written Report: A two-page group report summarizing your findings.
Presentation: A concise, 5-minute group presentation of your conclusion.
Step 1: Understand the Origins of the Theory
Objective: Investigate where the conspiracy theory or claim originated.
Tasks:
Research the background of the theory: who proposed it, when, and under what circumstances?
Create a timeline of key events and claims. What events led to the development of the theory?
Identify the original sources of the theory—are they credible or questionable?
Step 2: Research the Historical or Social Context
Objective: Examine the social, political, or historical context during the time when the theory arose.
Tasks:
Investigate what was happening at the time of the claim. Were there specific events, fears, or tensions (e.g., wars, political scandals, technological changes) that might have fueled belief in the theory?
Summarize key historical or social dynamics that could explain why the theory gained attention.
Step 3: Analyze the Evidence for the Theory
Objective: Evaluate the evidence presented in support of the theory.
Tasks:
Gather primary and secondary sources related to the claim. Are these sources credible? Do they align with other reliable historical or scientific records?
Look for inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence. Are there major logical jumps or contradictions in the theory’s narrative?
Identify if there are alternative explanations for the events or claims involved in the theory.
Step 4: Examine Characteristics of Conspiracy Theories
Objective: Learn about common features of conspiracy theories and apply this understanding to your theory.
Tasks:
Research the traits of conspiracy theories (e.g., reliance on secret knowledge, distrust of authorities, complex plots, etc.).
Compare these traits with your chosen theory. Does it share similarities with other conspiracy theories? Are there particular red flags that suggest it might be unreliable?
Step 5: Investigate Public Reactions and Media Coverage
Objective: Understand how the theory has been received by the public and the media.
Tasks:
Research how the theory was originally reported by the media and how it has evolved over time.
Analyze how the public reacted—did the theory gain widespread belief, or was it dismissed?
Identify if social media or specific platforms have played a role in spreading or debunking the theory.
Step 6: Formulate Your Conclusion
Objective: Summarize your findings and decide if the theory is believable.
Tasks:
Combine your research from previous steps. Does the evidence support or contradict the theory?
Check for logical inconsistencies, gaps in the timeline, and questionable sources.
Document your group’s conclusion: Is the theory fact, fiction, or a mix of both? Present any illogical jumps or flawed conclusions in your final report or presentation.
What are the main reasons people believe in this conspiracy theory?
How credible are the sources that promote or debunk the theory?
Could any social, political, or psychological factors explain why the theory spread?
Are there any alternative explanations that seem more plausible than the theory?
Historical documents, media reports, government archives, and scientific studies.
Reputable online databases, news organizations, and expert analyses.
Academic books and articles that cover the relevant time period or topic.